ORACLE SEQUENCE跳号总结

在ORACLE数据库中，序列（SEQUENCE）是使用非常频繁的一个数据库对象，但是有时候会遇到序列（SEQUECNE）跳号(skip sequence numbers)的情形，那么在哪些情形下会遇到跳号呢？

事务回滚引起的跳号

不管序列有没有CACHE、事务回滚这种情况下，都会引起序列的跳号。如下实验所示：

SQL> create sequence my_sequence

  2  start with 1

  3  increment by 1

  4  maxvalue 99999

  5  nocache;

Sequence created.

SQL>  create table test(id number(10), name varchar2(32));

Table created.

SQL> insert into test

  2  select my_sequence.nextval , 'kerry' from dual;

1 row created.

SQL>

SQL> rollback;

Rollback complete.

SQL> select my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

SQL>

并发访问序列引起的跳号

并发访问序列引起的跳号，其实不算真正的跳号，而只是逻辑跳号，只是序列值被其它并发会话使用了。我们来构造一起并发访问序列引起的跳号，我们开启两个会话窗口，循环获取序列的值，模拟并发出现的场景。

会话窗口A：

exec dbms_lock.sleep(2); --延迟2秒执行，根据你实验情况调整

begin

    for i in 1 .. 2000 loop

        dbms_output.put_line(my_sequence.nextval);

    end loop;

end;

会话窗口B：

spool test.txt;

begin

    waitfor delay '00:00:10';

    for i in 1 .. 2000 loop

        dbms_output.put_line(my_sequence.nextval);

    end loop;

end;

spool off;

如下所示，我构造的实验当中，你会看到序列的跳号情况。

FLUSH SHARED_POOL会导致CACHE的序列跳号

实验测试如下所示（序列的CACHE值必须大于0），当然正常情况下，很难遇到这种情况。

SQL> select test.my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

SQL> alter sequence test.my_sequence cache 40;

Sequence altered.

SQL> select test.my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

SQL> alter system flush share_pool;

alter system flush share_pool

ERROR at line 1:

ORA-02000: missing SHARED_POOL/BUFFER_CACHE/GLOBAL CONTEXT keyword

SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

System altered.

SQL> select test.my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

数据库实例异常关闭导致跳号

如下实验所示，当数据库使用shutdown abort命令关闭后，重新启动实例，序列缓存在shared pool里面没有用过的值都没有了。一下子从17045跳到17085

SQL> select test.my_sequence.currval from dual;

   CURRVAL

----------

SQL> select object_id from dba_objects where object_name=upper('my_sequence');

 OBJECT_ID

----------

SQL> select increment$, minvalue, maxvalue,highwater, cache

  2  from seq$ where obj#=97760;

INCREMENT$   MINVALUE   MAXVALUE  HIGHWATER      CACHE

---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

         1          1      99999      17085         40

SQL> shutdown abort;

ORACLE instance shut down.

SQL> startup;

ORA-32004: obsolete or deprecated parameter(s) specified for RDBMS instance

ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 1620115456 bytes

Fixed Size                  2213816 bytes

Variable Size            1258293320 bytes

Database Buffers          352321536 bytes

Redo Buffers                7286784 bytes

Database mounted.

Database opened.

SQL> select test.my_sequence.currval from dual;

select test.my_sequence.currval from dual

ERROR at line 1:

ORA-08002: sequence MY_SEQUENCE.CURRVAL is not yet defined in this session

SQL> select test.my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

SQL>

另外，我们也来看看正常关闭数据库的情况下，序列会不会出现跳号，我们采用10046跟踪事件，看看正常数据库关闭情况下，会对序列做一些啥操作

SQL> select test.my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 4';

Session altered.

SQL> shutdown immediate;

Database closed.

Database dismounted.

ORACLE instance shut down.

SQL> startup

ORA-32004: obsolete or deprecated parameter(s) specified for RDBMS instance

ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 1620115456 bytes

Fixed Size                  2213816 bytes

Variable Size            1258293320 bytes

Database Buffers          352321536 bytes

Redo Buffers                7286784 bytes

Database mounted.

Database opened.

SQL> select test.my_sequence.currval from dual;

select test.my_sequence.currval from dual

ERROR at line 1:

ORA-08002: sequence MY_SEQUENCE.CURRVAL is not yet defined in this session

SQL> select test.my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

SQL>

Trace文件中有更新seq$数据字典表，如果你看过我这篇文章ORACLE中seq$表更新频繁的分析，基本上就知道其实seq$中维护的是序列的一些信息。通过跟踪文件，我们知道在数据库正常关闭的情况下,会触发一个update seq$的操作,把当前的sequence.nextval的值更新到seq$.highwater中,从而使得sequence在有cache的情况下，数据库正常关闭未出现nextval跳跃(currval也同样不跳跃)；而在数据库异常关闭之时，数据库不能及时将sequence.nextval更新到eq$.highwater从而引起sequence cache中的值丢失，从而可能出现了sequence使用cache导致跳跃的情况

=====================

PARSING IN CURSOR #25 len=129 dep=1 uid=0 oct=6 lid=0 tim=1504236336294194 hv=2635489469 ad='bf780410' sqlid='4m7m0t6fjcs5x'

update seq$ set increment$=:2,minvalue=:3,maxvalue=:4,cycle#=:5,order$=:6,cache=:7,highwater=:8,audit$=:9,flags=:10 where obj#=:1

END OF STMT

PARSE #25:c=0,e=21,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=4,plh=1935744642,tim=1504236336294194

BINDS #25:

 Bind#0

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(02) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=18 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=bf45ca48  bln=24  avl=02  flg=09

  value=1

 Bind#1

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(02) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=18 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=bf45ca5a  bln=24  avl=02  flg=09

:/17086

 Bind#3

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(22) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=08 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=2b7d80f57350  bln=24  avl=01  flg=05

  value=0

 Bind#4

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(22) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=08 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=2b7d80f57320  bln=24  avl=01  flg=05

  value=0

 Bind#5

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(02) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=18 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=bf47b85e  bln=24  avl=02  flg=09

  value=40

 Bind#6

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(04) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=18 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=bf47b870  bln=24  avl=04  flg=09

  value=17086

 Bind#7

  oacdty=01 mxl=32(32) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=18 fl2=0001 frm=01 csi=873 siz=32 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=bf47b882  bln=32  avl=32  flg=09

  value="--------------------------------"

 Bind#8

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(22) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=08 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=2b7d80f572f0  bln=24  avl=02  flg=05

  value=8

 Bind#9

  oacdty=02 mxl=22(22) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00

  oacflg=08 fl2=0001 frm=00 csi=00 siz=24 off=0

  kxsbbbfp=2b7d80f57380  bln=22  avl=04  flg=05

  value=97760

EXEC #9:c=999,e=709,p=0,cr=1,cu=2,mis=0,r=1,dep=1,og=4,plh=1935744642,tim=1504236336297033

CLOSE #9:c=0,e=2,dep=1,type=3,tim=1504236336297058

mealink上提到了使用dbms_shared_pool.keep将对象在锁定在shared pool 中，永远不释放。这样可以防止FLUSH SHARED POOL导致序列跳号，但是这个无法避免数据库异常关闭或CRASH引起的跳号

SQL> select test.my_sequence.currval from dual;

   CURRVAL

----------

SQL> exec dbms_shared_pool.keep('test.my_sequence','q');

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;

System altered.

SQL> select test.my_sequence.currval from dual;

   CURRVAL

----------

SQL> shutdown abort

ORACLE instance shut down.

SQL> startup

ORA-32004: obsolete or deprecated parameter(s) specified for RDBMS instance

ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 1620115456 bytes

Fixed Size                  2213816 bytes

Variable Size            1258293320 bytes

Database Buffers          352321536 bytes

Redo Buffers                7286784 bytes

Database mounted.

Database opened.

SQL> select test.my_sequence.nextval from dual;

   NEXTVAL

----------

其实如果业务允许，单号出现跳号也无所谓的情形最好，如果碰到业务要求绝对不能出现单号出现跳号的情况，那么就不能使用序列号了，就必须使用其它替代方案，此处不做展开说明！

参考资料：

Sequence Number Generator Generating Numbers With Gaps (文档 ID 470784.1)

Using the Oracle DBMS_SHARED_POOL Package (文档 ID 61760.1)

http://www.xifenfei.com/2015/04/%E6%AD%A3%E5%B8%B8%E5%85%B3%E9%97%AD%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%BA%93sequence-cache%E4%B8%8D%E4%B8%BA0-sequence%E4%B8%8D%E8%B7%B3%E8%B7%83.html

巴特西

ORACLE SEQUENCE跳号总结

最新文章

热门文章