Collections工具类里的

Collections.synchronizedList

public static <T> List<T> synchronizedList(List<T> list) {

    return (list instanceof RandomAccess ?

                new SynchronizedRandomAccessList<T>(list) :

                new SynchronizedList<T>(list));

    }

##不过通过推断是否实现RandomAccess接口,而返回不同的SynchronizedList(内部)类,

##RandomAccess foreach较快, iterator较慢,区别不明显(如i5上,本人測试,一个ArrayList,90w个object,  foreach出来是6多ms, iterator出来7ms)

##SequenceAccess foreach较慢,iterator较快.区别很明显. (如i5上,本人測试,一个LinkedList,10w个object,  foreach出来是200多ms, iterator出来仅4ms)

LinkedList的get(n) 方法.   源代码里写得也有点妙,一不留意 确实是个坑.    (这是SequenceAccess 的foreach 慢的原因)

private Entry<E> entry(int index) {

        if (index < 0 || index >= size)

            throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Index: "+index+

                                                ", Size: "+size);

        Entry<E> e = header;

        if (index < (size >> 1)) {

            for (int i = 0; i <= index; i++)

                e = e.next;

        } else {

            for (int i = size; i > index; i--)

                e = e.previous;

        }

        return e;

    }