Linear regression with one variable - Cost function intuition I

摘要: 本文是吴恩达 (Andrew Ng)老师《机器学习》课程，第二章《单变量线性回归》中第8课时《代价函数的直观认识 - 1》的视频原文字幕。为本人在视频学习过程中逐字逐句记录下来以便日后查阅使用。现分享给大家。如有错误，欢迎大家批评指正，在此表示诚挚地感谢！同时希望对大家的学习能有所帮助。

In the previous video (article), we gave the mathematical definition of the cost function. In this video (article), let's look at some examples to get back to intuition about what the cost function is doing, and why we want to use it.

To recap, here's what we had last time. We want to fit a straight line to our data, so we had this formed as a hypothesis with these parameters $\theta _{0}$ and $\theta _{1}$ , and with different choices of the parameters, we end up with different straight-line fits. So, the data which are fit like so. And there's a cost function, and that was our optimization objective. For this video (article), in order to better visualize the cost function J, I'm going to work with a simplified hypothesis function, like that shown on the right. So, I'm gonna use my simplified hypothesis which is just $\theta _{1}x$ . We can, if you want, think of this as setting the parameter $\theta _{0}=0$ . So, I have only one parameter $\theta _{1}$ , and my cost function is similar to before except that now $h_{\theta }(x)=\theta _{1}x$ . And I have only one parameter $\theta _{1}$ , and so my optimization objective is to minimize $J(\theta _{1})$ . In pictures, what this means is that if $\theta _{0}=0$ that corresponds to choosing only hypothesis functions that pass through the origin, that pass through the point $(0, 0)$ . Using the simplified definition of hypothesis cost function, let's try to understand the cost function concept better.

It turns out that two key functions we want to understand. The first is the hypothesis function, and the second is the cost function. So, notice that the hypothesis, right, $h_{\theta }(x)$ . For a fixed value of $\theta _{1}$ , this is a function of x. So, the hypothesis is a function of what is the size of the house x. In contrast, the cost function J, that's a function of the parameter $\theta _{1}$ which controls the slope of the straight line. Let's plot these functions and try to understand them both better. Let's start with the hypothesis. On the left, let's say here's my training set with three points at $(1, 1), (2, 2) and (3, 3)$ . Let's pick a value $\theta _{1}$ , so when set $\theta _{1}$ =1, and if that's my choice for $\theta _{1}$ , then my hypothesis is going to look like this straight line over here. And I'm gonna point out when I'm plotting my hypothesis function, my X-axis, my horizontal axis is labeled x, is labeled as you know, size of the house over here. Now, of temporary, set $\theta _{1}=1$ . What I want to do is figure out what is $J(\theta _{1})$ when $\theta _{1}$ =1. So, let's go ahead and compute what the cost function has for the value one. Well, as usual, my cost function is defined as follows, right? Sum from some of them are my training set of this usual squared error term. And this is therefore equal to $\theta _{1}x^{(i)}-y^{(i)}$ , and if you simplify, this turns out to be $1/2m(0^{2} + 0^{2} + 0^{2})$ , which is of course, just equal to 0. Now, inside the cost function, it turns out, each of these terms here is equal to 0. Because for the specific training set I have, for my 3 training examples there, $(1, 1), (2, 2) and (3, 3)$ , if $\theta _{1}=1$ , then $h_{\theta }(x^{(i)})=y^{(i)}$ exactly. And so, $h_{\theta }(x^{(i)})-y^{(i)}$ , each of these terms is equal to 0, which is why I find that $J(1)=0$ . Let's plot that. What I'm gonna do on the right is plot my cost function J. And notice, because my cost function is a function of my parameter $\theta _{1}$ , when I plot my cost function, the horizontal axis is now labeled with $\theta _{1}$ . So, I have $J(1)=0$ , so let's go ahead and plot that. End up with an X over there. Now let's look at some other examples. $\theta _{1}$ can take on a range of different values. Right? So $\theta _{1}$ can take on the negative values, zero and positive values. So, what if $\theta _{1}=0.5$ ? Let's go ahead and plot that.

I'm now going to set $\theta _{1}=0.5$ , and in that case, my hypothesis looks like this. As a line with slope equals to 0.5. And, let's compute $J(0.5)$ . So, that is going to be $1/2m$ of my usual cost function. It turns out that the cost function is going to be the sum of square values of the height of this line, plus the sum of square of the height of that line, plus the sum of square of the height of that line, right? Because just this vertical distance, that's the difference between $y^{(i)}$ and the predicted value $h_{\theta }(x^{(i)})$ . So, the first example is going to be $(0.5*1-1)^{2}$ . For my second example, I get $(0.5*2-2)^{2}$ , because my hypothesis predicted one, but the actual housing price was two. And finally, plus $(0.5*3-3)^{2}$ . And so that's equal to $1/(2*3)(3.5)\approx 0.58$ . So now we know $J(0.5)$ is about 0.58. Let's go and plot that. So, we plot that which is maybe about over there. Now, let's do one more. How about if $\theta _{1}=0$ , what is $J(0)$ equal to?

It turns out if $\theta _{1}=0$ , $h_{\theta }(x)$ is just equal to 0, you know, this flat line, that just goes horizontally like his. And so, measuring the errors. We have that just $J(0)=1/(2*m)*(1^{2}+2^{2}+3^{2})=1/6*14\approx 2.3$ . So, let's go ahead and plot that as well. So, it ends up with a value around 2.3. And of course, we can keep on doing this for other values of $\theta _{1}$ . It turns out that you can have negative for other values of $\theta _{1}$ as well. So if $\theta _{1}$ is negative, then $h\theta (x)$ would be equal to say $h_{\theta }(x)=-0.5x$ , then $\theta _{1}=-0.5$ , and so that corresponds to a hypothesis with a slope of -0.5. And you can actually keep on computing these errors. This turns out to be, you know, for -0.5, it turns out to have really high error. It works out to be something, like, 5.25 and so on. And for different values of $\theta _{1}$ , you can compute these things. And it turns out that you computed range of values, you get something like that. And by computing the range of values, you can actually slowly create out what this function $J(\theta )$ looks like. And that's what $J(\theta )$ is. To recap, for each value of $\theta _{1}$ , right? Each value of $\theta _{1}$ corresponds to a different hypothesis, or to a different straight line fit on the left. And for each value of $\theta _{1}$ , we could then derive a different a different value of $J(\theta _{1})$ . And for example, $\theta _{1}=1$ corresponds to this straight line (in cyan) straight through the data. Whereas $\theta _{1}=0.5$ , and this point shown in magenta, corresponded to maybe that line (in magenta). And $\theta _{1}=0$ , which is shown in blue, that corresponds to this horizontal line (in blue). So, for each value of $\theta _{1}$ , we wound up with a different value of $J(\theta _{1})$ . And then we could use this to trace out this plot on the right. Now you remember the optimization objective for our learning algorithm is we want to choose the value of $\theta _{1}$ , that minimizes $J(\theta _{1})$ . This ( $\overset{minimize}{\theta _{1}} J(\theta _{1})$ ) was our objective function for the linear regression. Well, looking at this curve, the value that minimizes $J(\theta _{1})$ is $\theta _{1}=1$ . And low and behold, that is indeed the best possible straight line fit throughout data, by setting $\theta _{1}=1$ . And just for this particular training set, we actually end up fitting it perfectly. And that's why minimizing $J(\theta _{1})$ corresponds to finding a straight line that fits the data well. So, to wrap up, in this video (article), we looked at some plots to understand the cost function. To do so, we simplified the algorithm, so that it only had one parameter $\theta _{1}$ . And we set the parameter $\theta _{0}=0$ . In the next video (article), we'll go back to the original problem formulation, and look at some visualizations involving both $\theta _{0}$ and $\theta _{1}$ . That is without setting $\theta _{0}=0$ . And hopefully that will give you an even better sense of what the cost function J is doing in the original linear regression.

巴特西

Linear regression with one variable - Cost function intuition I

最新文章

热门文章