各种语言web性能简单对比测试

忽然想比较一下 python nodejs go 的web 响应，就简单的写了个性能对比测试。

测试目标：
1 . i5 4核 32G 同一机器 linux
2. 用python（flask线程模式） nodejs go 分别写了简单的 echo 服务

测试工具：
wrk

服务器清单：

python  flask      http://192.168.0.208:5050/

nodejs  express    http://192.168.0.208:5056/

go      server     http://192.168.0.208:5057/

测试脚本：

wrk -c100 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5050/

wrk -c100 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5056/

wrk -c100 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5057/

wrk -c1000 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5050/

wrk -c1000 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5056/

wrk -c1000 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5057/

测试结果：

100 终端10线程

Running 30s test @ http://192.168.0.208:5050/

   threads and  connections

  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev

    Latency    .24ms   .29ms .28ms   90.54%

    Req/Sec   137.84     54.19   202.00     63.72%

   requests in .03s, .79MB read

  Socket errors: connect , read , write , timeout

Requests/sec:    956.35

Transfer/sec:    .62KB

hylas@keras208:~$ wrk -c100 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5056/

Running 30s test @ http://192.168.0.208:5056/

   threads and  connections

  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev

    Latency     .37ms  .63us  .71ms   98.57%

    Req/Sec     .25k   253.62     .32k    97.80%

   requests in .01s, .82MB read

Requests/sec:  42284.18

Transfer/sec:      .29MB

hylas@keras208:~$ wrk -c100 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5057/

Running 30s test @ http://192.168.0.208:5057/

   threads and  connections

  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev

    Latency     .20ms    .19ms .37ms   91.89%

    Req/Sec    .93k     .45k   .58k    72.80%

   requests in .07s, .45MB read

Requests/sec: 138501.94

Transfer/sec:     .53MB

1000终端 10 线程

hylas@keras208:~$ wrk -c1000 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5050/

Running 30s test @ http://192.168.0.208:5050/

   threads and  connections

  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev

    Latency   .59ms  .37ms   .97s    91.52%

    Req/Sec   129.50     92.32   610.00     66.97%

   requests in .09s, .28MB read

  Socket errors: connect , read , write , timeout

Requests/sec:   1022.24

Transfer/sec:    .57KB

hylas@keras208:~$ wrk -c1000 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5056/

Running 30s test @ http://192.168.0.208:5056/

   threads and  connections

  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev

    Latency    .00ms    .27ms .53ms   96.69%

    Req/Sec     .01k   480.69    .12k    94.63%

   requests in .09s, .03MB read

Requests/sec:  39545.31

Transfer/sec:      .88MB

hylas@keras208:~$ wrk -c1000 -t10 -d30s  http://192.168.0.208:5057/

Running 30s test @ http://192.168.0.208:5057/

   threads and  connections

  Thread Stats   Avg      Stdev     Max   +/- Stdev

    Latency    .17ms   .92ms .96ms   91.23%

    Req/Sec    .94k     .57k   .62k    70.73%

   requests in .09s, .57MB read

Requests/sec: 127325.42

Transfer/sec:     .79MB

结论：

1. 100 终端时：python 延时最大，与另外两个相差一个数量级， nodejs go 差不多。 Req/Sec 比例分别是 0.13 ： 4：13 ， go能大大 13k/s
2. 1000 终端时： nodejs 和 go 的延时增加，但还是明显优与 python , Req/Sec 保持稳定 python 最低，nodejs ：go 3:12 go的峰值 79k/s
3. 在高并发web服务中首选 go ， nodejs 次之 python 最弱

ps: 以上结论未考虑开发效率，人员薪资成本等因素

巴特西

各种语言web性能简单对比测试

最新文章

热门文章