个人作业-Week3
个人作业-Week3
1. 软件工程师的成长
同学们在上这门课的时候，还是大三，你的困难和迷茫，别人一定有过。请看看别人怎么学习的，有些是科班，有些是野路子，有些成功，有些失败。 请读完下面所有博客（也可以再读一些你觉得有意思的博客），谈谈自己的感想，你现在的条件比他们如何？你对计算机的热爱仅仅是口头的么？IT专业的技术道路，职业道路，社会道路怎么计划呢
感想：如果要在计算机这条道路上走的更远，需要基础扎实，更需要不断的学习和创新。
条件：与他们中的一些人相当甚至更好
我对计算机的热爱不仅是口头上的，在平时的学习生活中，我也十分愿意使用编程的方法解决一些实际的问题。
计划：以后可能会读研，进入公司工作，职业道路和社会道路的规划简而言之就是先做一个程序员，然后通过参与不同的项目不断提升自己，使自己的水平不断提高。
2. 代码复审
每位同学复审其结对编程的伙伴的个人项目，并写一个个人博客报告复审结果
General
- Does the code work? Does it perform its intended function, the logic is correct etc.
◦ Yes.
- Is all the code easily understood?
◦ Yes.
- Does it conform to your agreed coding conventions? These will usually cover location of braces, variable and function names, line length, indentations, formatting, and comments.
◦ Yes.
- Is there any redundant or duplicate code?
◦ Yes.
- Is the code as modular as possible?
◦ Yes.
- Can any global variables be replaced?
◦ Yes.
- Is there any commented out code?
◦ Yes.
- Do loops have a set length and correct termination conditions?
◦ Yes.
- Can any of the code be replaced with library functions?
◦ No.
- Can any logging or debugging code be removed?
◦ No.
Security
- Are all data inputs checked (for the correct type, length, format, and range) and encoded?
◦ Yes.
- Where third-party utilities are used, are returning errors being caught?
◦ No.
- Are output values checked and encoded?
◦ No.
- Are invalid parameter values handled?
◦ Yes.
Documentation
- Do comments exist and describe the intent of the code?
◦ No.
- Are all functions commented?
◦ No.
- Is any unusual behavior or edge-case handling described?
◦ Yes.
- Is the use and function of third-party libraries documented?
◦ No.
- Are data structures and units of measurement explained?
◦ No.
- Is there any incomplete code? If so, should it be removed or flagged with a suitable marker like ‘TODO’?
◦ No.
Testing
- Is the code testable? i.e. don’t add too many or hide dependencies, unable to initialize objects, test frameworks can use methods etc.
◦ Yes.
- Do tests exist and are they comprehensive? i.e. has at least your agreed on code coverage.
◦ No.
- Do unit tests actually test that the code is performing the intended functionality?
◦ Yes.
- Are arrays checked for ‘out-of-bound’ errors?
◦ No.
- Could any test code be replaced with the use of an existing API?
◦ No.
最新文章
- 我的权限系统设计实现MVC4 + WebAPI + EasyUI + Knockout（一）
- 免费获取WP之类的开发者权限或免费使用Azure 2015-10-19
- NOI2018准备 Day9
- Git-it字典翻译
- SD卡读写遇到的一些函数
- java里的static和final
- Table Groups [AX 2012]
- 炮(cannon)
- EMVTag系列14《支付环境响应数据》
- 实例介绍Cocos2d-x开关菜单
- ASP.NET中设置一个定时器来定时更新 转
- （bug更正）利用KVC和associative特性在NSObject中存储键值
- Bzoj 2038: [2009国家集训队]小Z的袜子(hose) 莫队,分块,暴力
- struts2，hibernate，spring整合笔记(1)
- Spark Wordcount
- [国嵌攻略][099][Linux内核配置与编译]
- 微信小程序-框架详解(1)
- 将.ipynb文件导入到另外的文件中
- 吸血鬼日记第一季/全集The Vampire Diaries迅雷下载
- python多线程与线程